It makes you wonder if there are little boys the atheist has performed "mild touching up" with? How can you trust an avowed atheist to obey the unwritten law of decency that God has placed in every heart? You can't. WHY? The conscience has been seared. (1 Timothy 4: 2 ) Satan eventually exposes his own slaves and no doubt gets his jollies out of seeing them squirm as decent folks rise up against sexual deviants and pedophiles. - Pastor Max Solbrekken

Proud Pervert, Pedophile, Atheist, Richard Dawkins defends “mild pedophilia,” says it does not cause “lasting harm”

Posted on September 11, 2013 by shepherdguardian
Proud Atheist, Leftist, Richard Dawkins defends "mild pedophia," says it does not cause "lasting harm"  

Posted on September 11, 2013

Richard Dawkins defends “mild pedophilia,” says it does not cause “lasting harm” – Salon.com.

The biologist and author described the sexual abuse that occurred among his former classmates as “mild touching up”

In a recent interview with the Times magazine, Richard Dawkins attempted to defend what he called “mild pedophilia,” which, he says, he personally experienced as a young child and does not believe causes “lasting harm.”

Dawkins went on to say that one of his former school masters “pulled me on his knee and put his hand inside my shorts,” and that to condemn this “mild touching up” as sexual abuse today would somehow be unfair.

“I am very conscious that you can’t condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours. Just as we don’t look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism, I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild pedophilia, and can’t find it in me to condemn it by the same standards as I or anyone would today,” he said.

Plus, he added, though his other classmates also experienced abuse at the hands of this teacher, “I don’t think he did any of us lasting harm.”

Child welfare experts responded to Dawkins’ remarks with outrage — and concern over their effect on survivors of abuse.

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Richard Dawkins Refuses to Condemn Mild Pedophilia

(Credit: Reuters/Andrew Winning)

In a recent interview with the Times magazine, Richard Dawkins attempted to defend what he called “mild pedophilia,” which, he says, he personally experienced as a young child and does not believe causes “lasting harm.”

Dawkins went on to say that one of his former school masters “pulled me on his knee and put his hand inside my shorts,” and that to condemn this “mild touching up” as sexual abuse today would somehow be unfair.

“I am very conscious that you can’t condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours. Just as we don’t look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism, I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild pedophilia, and can’t find it in me to condemn it by the same standards as I or anyone would today,” he said.

Plus, he added, though his other classmates also experienced abuse at the hands of this teacher, “I don’t think he did any of us lasting harm.”

Child welfare experts responded to Dawkins’ remarks with outrage — and concern over their effect on survivors of abuse.